The Performance Audit
[4] weeks. One number: what your asset should be earning, and why it isn’t — with every driver behind the gap identified and ranked.
One report. One number. Every driver behind it.
The Profit Gap Report states what your asset should be producing given its market, product and positioning — and decomposes the difference between that and what it actually produces into named, ranked, costed drivers.
It is written to be read by an owner in [40] minutes and worked by a GM for [90] days. There is no appendix nobody opens.
By the end of week four you will know:
- 01What your asset is actually capable of earning.
- 02Where exactly the gap is — rate, occupancy, mix, cost, or operations.
- 03Which fixes are worth doing, ranked by return per unit of effort.
- 04What it would take, in money and months, to close the gap.
- 05Whether your current team, technology and pricing are fit for that plan.
What happens, and what it costs you in time.
Data & access
System access, [24] months of financial and booking data, contracts, org chart. We establish the baseline and tell you immediately if anything critical is missing.
Analysis & benchmarking
Demand, rate, mix, channel contribution after cost, P&L reconstruction, CPOR and flow-through, comp-set positioning.
Operational review
On site where practical: property walk against a [X]-point standard, mystery stay, staff interviews, technology and data audit.
Report & plan
The Profit Gap Report, the ranked opportunity register, the 90-day install plan, and a live presentation with your team.
A fixed fee, published — and a condition attached.
The audit is [from US$X,XXX] per asset, quoted in full before you commit, scaled by size and complexity. It does not move.
And a condition we put in writing: if we cannot identify a profit gap of at least [X]× the audit fee, the report says so and recommends you stop there. We will not sell you an implementation that does not pay for itself.
Nobody else in this market publishes a fee. We do it because a buyer who cannot see the number assumes the worst, and because filtering out engagements that are not a fit protects your time as much as ours.
Three honest outcomes.
You implement it yourself
The report, the model and the plan are yours. Many owners run the 90-day plan with their own team. We are available for review sessions if useful, and that is the whole of it.
Performance Sprint
We implement the highest-return items — usually one or two disciplines — on a fixed scope and fixed fee against the plan.
Retained Partnership
We install across all six disciplines and stay accountable to the baseline, reporting monthly. This is where most assets with a material gap end up.
We tell you to stop
If the gap does not justify the work, the report says so. It costs us a client and saves you a great deal more.
Before you ask.
What does the audit cost?
What if you do not find anything worth fixing?
How much of my time does it take?
Do you need to visit the property?
What data do you need from us?
Do we have to engage you afterwards?
Will our operator or GM find out?
How is this different from a feasibility study or a valuation?
Book the call that starts the audit.
20 minutes. We ask about the asset, the numbers and what has already been tried — then tell you whether an audit is worth commissioning and what it would cost for your property.
No pitch deck. No obligation. If we are not the right firm for your asset, we will say so on the call.
Not ready to talk? Send us the numbers instead →